Reject ethnic and racial prejudice.
Hitchens begins with equal human dignity rather than religious identity or ritual observance.
Christopher Hitchens proposed a sharply modern alternative to the traditional Ten Commandments, shifting the emphasis away from ritual obedience and toward human dignity, liberty, anti-cruelty, and moral responsibility.
The ten themes below are concise editorial paraphrases, not a reproduction of Hitchens's original wording. Together they recast the moral conversation in secular, human-centred terms rather than divine command.
Hitchens begins with equal human dignity rather than religious identity or ritual observance.
His second concern is an absolute rejection of slavery, ownership, and human exploitation.
Consent and freedom from intimidation become explicit moral duties rather than implied ones.
The safety of children is stated directly as a fundamental test of adult conduct.
People should not be punished or shamed for aspects of themselves they did not choose.
Human beings are animals within an ecological web and should act with that dependence in mind.
Respectability, paperwork, or financial complexity does not make dishonest enrichment morally different from robbery.
His deliberately comic line about mobile phones makes ordinary public courtesy part of modern ethics.
Crusades, jihadism, and related forms of absolutism are judged by the harm they cause rather than the faith they invoke.
No god, faith, or commandment should be exempt from moral scrutiny when it conflicts with human dignity.
Read the primary sources: Christopher Hitchens, “The New Commandments”, Vanity Fair (April 2010), and Vanity Fair’s official video, “Thou Shalt Watch This Video”.
Hitchens's list is vivid and memorable, and its real force lies in what it exposes: how limited the traditional commandments can seem when judged as a complete moral guide for modern life.
Its strongest lines are clear moral claims about cruelty, slavery, dignity, honesty, and violence. In that sense, the list works less as a casual parody than as a deliberate challenge to the old framework: if a timeless set of commandments leaves so much unsaid about equality, abuse, freedom, and responsibility, then perhaps it is not sufficient on its own.
Some entries are still highly topical, deliberately provocative, or shaped by the controversies of their moment. But that too reveals the difficulty of writing a new moral canon: a modern set must be vivid enough to confront real abuses, broad enough to endure, and clear enough to guide conduct across more than one generation.